This document is interesting, but seems flawed in a few key areas:

1. Irreversible. This will trigger very specific immune reactions for years into the future, unlike conventional drugs like Ivermectin which are gone from the body in weeks. Yuri has no idea what happens when a vax'ed person becomes infected with a variant which has evolved to become nearly invisible!

2. What happens when we put evolutionary pressure to evolve around? Yuri says that unvaccinated will cause the escape mutations, but there's another possibility, which is that the vax'ed will do that.

Yuri says Geert is wrong about one topic, but that isn't the only important point he's making. Geert is saying that we are doing a serial passage experiment using humans to evolve a virus around the vaccines by doing a mass-vaccination campaign during a pandemic. How come that important possibility isn't even addressed in this paper?

Geert might be wrong on the issue regarding antigen-specific antibodies , but that doesn't mean he's wrong on everything. Just like the fact that this article has several mistakes doesn't mean it's wrong about everything.

What happens if the virus becomes invisible to the Gen 1 injections? I wonder if Yuri is familiar with the concept of a dog chasing its tail, which is a great analogy for vaccinating in the middle of a pandemic.

3. Ivermectin has perfect results when given early. He completely ignores the important concept of time when discussing effectiveness. There's a ton of data that Ivermectin is both safer and more effective than these vaccines when given right away, and it works against all strains.

4. He also totally ignore the auto-immune issues and other serious problems that many people are reporting. What about all the miscarriages?

Of course, if he fixed all these issues, he'd have to change the title, and the thesis.